Skip to main content

Stacey D. Wolf

Title: Associate Librarian

Department: Library - CM - Cataloging & Metadata Services

College: University of North Texas

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2016
    Major: Library Science
  • MA, George Mason University, 2011
    Major: History
    Specialization: Applied History
  • BA, University of North Texas, 2009
    Major: History

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Blog Post

  • Yanowski, K., Wolf, S., Evans, K. (2021). LCSH change at the UNT Library. Chicago, Illinois, American Library Association. http://www.ala.org/advocacy/diversity/odlos-blog/subject-headings-UNT-libraries
  • Journal Article

  • Wolf, S. (2020). Automating Authority Control Processes. Code4Lib Journal. (47) Code4Lib. https://journal.code4lib.org/articles/15014
  • Magazine/Trade Publication

  • Wolf, S. (2019). Technology Project Management: Following Best Practices & Building Your Skill Set. Other. Chicago, IL, Association for Library Collections & Technical Services (ALCTS). https://alcts.ala.org/news/2019/technology-project-management/

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Hong, L. (Principal), Thomale, J.J. (Co-Principal), Wolf, S.D. (Supporting), Yanowski, K.J. (Supporting), "Gauging Library Needs for Advanced AI-Assisted Cataloging," sponsored by Institute of Museum and Library Services, Federal, $128130 Funded. (2024 - 2026).
  • Harker, K.R. (Principal), Byrne, S. (Supporting), Leuzinger, J.A. (Supporting), Rodriguez, A.E. (Supporting), Brannon, S.D. (Supporting), Wolf, S.D. (Supporting), "UNT Libraries Dean's Innovation Grants (DIG)," sponsored by UNT Libraries, University of North Texas, $4975 Funded. (2022 - 2023).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE