Skip to main content

Suyash Garg

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Management

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Texas at Dallas, 2025
    Major: International Management Studies

Current Scheduled Teaching

MGMT 5710.401Seminar in Business Ethics and Social ResponsibilityFall 8W2 2026
MGMT 5710.402Seminar in Business Ethics and Social ResponsibilityFall 8W2 2026
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MGMT 5710.402Seminar in Business Ethics and Social ResponsibilitySpring 8W2 2026 SPOT
MGMT 5710.403Seminar in Business Ethics and Social ResponsibilitySpring 8W2 2026 SPOT
MGMT 5710.401Seminar in Business Ethics and Social ResponsibilityFall 8W2 2025 SPOT
MGMT 5710.402Seminar in Business Ethics and Social ResponsibilityFall 8W2 2025 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Garg, S., Lin, Z., Yang, H. (2023). Board caste diversity in Indian MNEs: The interplay of stakeholder norms and social embeddedness. Journal of International Business Studies. 54 (5) 797-828. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00588-6
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE