Skip to main content

Sarah Quintanar

Title: Clinical Assistant Professor

Department: ADA - Advanced Data Analytics

College: University of North Texas

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Louisiana State University, 2011
    Major: Economics
    Dissertation: The Economics of Discrimination in the Court System: Police, Technology, and Their Interaction
  • MS, Louisiana State University, 2008
    Major: Economics

Current Scheduled Teaching

ADTA 5940.001Analytics Capstone ExperienceFall 2024
ADTA 5820.001Analytics Leadership and CommunicationFall 2024
ADTA 5820.410Analytics Leadership and CommunicationFall 8W2 2024
ADTA 5940.001Analytics Capstone ExperienceSummer 10W 2024
ADTA 5230.401Data Analytics IISummer 8W1 2024 SPOT
ADTA 5900.401Special ProblemsSummer 10W 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ADTA 5940.001Analytics Capstone ExperienceSummer 10W 2024
ADTA 5230.401Data Analytics IISummer 8W1 2024 SPOT
ADTA 5900.401Special ProblemsSummer 10W 2024
ADTA 5820.001Analytics Leadership and CommunicationSpring 2024 SPOT
IPAC 4130.410Data Analytics and Computational Statistics 1Spring 8W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ADTA 5130.410Data Analytics ISpring 8W2 2024 SPOT
ADTA 5130.411Data Analytics ISpring 8W2 2024 SPOT
ADTA 5160.501Sport and Entertainment AnalyticsSpring 2024 SPOT
IPAC 4130.001Data Analytics and Computational Statistics 1Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
IPAC 4230.002Data Analytics and Computational Statistics 2Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
IPAC 4230.700Data Analytics and Computational Statistics 2Fall 8W2 2023 SPOT
ADTA 5130.001Data Analytics IFall 2023 SPOT
ADTA 5130.011Data Analytics IFall 2023 SPOT
ADTA 5230.002Data Analytics IIFall 2023 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Quintanar, S., Wagner, G. Understanding the Punitive Cost of a Mug Shot: A Case Study of Machine Learning.
  • Quintanar, S., McMahon, M. Identifying Home Field Advantage: New Evidence from COVID Ghost Games. Southern Economic Journal.
  • Quintanar, S., Terry, A., Sims, E. Wine-Grapes Over Time: A Case Study on the Influence of Consumer Demand.

    • Newspaper

  • Quintanar, S., Martinez, J. (2022). Policom Survey of City's Prospects Gives Incomplete Picture of Growth. Times Record News. https://www.timesrecordnews.com/story/news/2022/02/24/policom-survey-citys-prospects-gives-incomplete-picture-growth/6926416001/
  • Quintanar, S. (2021). Does school financing raise property values?. Times Record News. Wichita Falls, TX,
  • Quintanar, S., Martinez, J. (2021). Education is the key to attracting local businesses. Times Record News. Wichita Falls, TX, https://www.timesrecordnews.com/story/news/2021/04/19/op-ed-does-school-financing-raise-property-values/7286400002/
  • Quintanar, S. (2020). Coronavirus economy imperils small businesses, entrepreneurs in Wichita Falls. Times Record News. Wichita Falls, TX,
  • Quintanar, S., Martinez, J. (2020). Puzzling economic trends: A look at past 20 years in Wichita Falls. Times Record News. Wichita Falls, TX, https://www.timesrecordnews.com/story/news/local/2020/06/07/puzzling-economic-trends-look-past-20-years-wichita-falls/3165247001/
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE