Skip to main content

Sanghoon Kim

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Political Science

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

PSCI 4661.001Politics of AutocracyFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Kim-Leffingwell, S., Sallenback, E. (2024). Mnemonic Politics among Philippine Voters: A Social Media Measurement Approach. Democratization.
  • Gong, D., Kim-Leffingwell, S., Yang, Y., Shen, S. (2024). Money Backfires: How Chinese Investment Fuels Anti-China Protests Abroad. World Development. 178 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106566
  • Usher, N., Kim-Leffingwell, S. (2023). Authoritarian Legacies and Partisan Bias in Corruption Voting: Evidence from South Korea. International Journal of Press/Politics. Online first https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612231186939
  • Kim, S. (2023). Authoritarian Legacies and Partisan Bias in Corruption Voting: Evidence from South Korea.. Journal of East Asian Studies. 23 (2) 241-262.
  • Yang, Y., Kim-Leffingwell, S., Gong, D., Shen, S. (2023). Killing Protests with Kindness: Anti-China Protests and China’s Public Diplomacy. International Studies Quarterly. 67 (4) https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqad087
  • Kim-Leffingwell, S. (2023). Personality Traits, Democratic Support, and Authoritarian Nostalgia. Social Science Quarterly. 23 (2) 241-262. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13286
  • Kim-Leffingwell, S. (2023). Alternative Legacies of Authoritarianism: Pro-dictator Bias in Ideology. Party Politics. 29 (3) 580-586. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221083559
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE