Skip to main content

Sarah L. DePetris

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Studio Art

College: College of Visual Arts and Design

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ADES 4662.020Design Management Integrative CapstoneSummer 5W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ASTU 2201.503Beginning Drawing and Painting: Painting ISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ASTU 2202.502Beginning Drawing and Painting: Painting IISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 4662.021Design Management Integrative CapstoneSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ART 3030.023Digital Communication for Art and Creative EntrepreneurshipSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ASTU 2201.502Beginning Drawing and Painting: Painting IFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 4662.020Design Management Integrative CapstoneFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ASTU 3202.502Intermediate Drawing and Painting: Figure Drawing IFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ASTU 3202.501Intermediate Drawing and Painting: Figure Drawing ISpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ASTU 3202.506Intermediate Drawing and Painting: Figure Drawing IFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ASTU 2201.502Beginning Drawing and Painting: Painting ISpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ASTU 2201.507Beginning Drawing and Painting: Painting IFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1800.418Foundations: Narrative and RepresentationSpring 2021 SPOT
ART 1700.303Foundations: Space (physical, temporal and virtual)Fall 2020 SPOT
ART 1700.304Foundations: Space (physical, temporal and virtual)Fall 2020 SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE