Skip to main content

Samantha L. Jordan

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Management

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Florida State University, 2021
    Major: Business Administration - Management
    Specialization: Organizational Behavior and Human Resources
    Dissertation: Politics got you down? Intraindividual variability in perceptions of organizational politics and unmet motivational strivings at work
  • BS, University of Florida, 2015
    Major: Psychology

Current Scheduled Teaching

MGMT 6060.001Contemporary Issues in Macro Oriented Management Research SeminarSpring 2025
MGMT 5140.403Organizational Behavior and AnalysisSpring 8W2 2025
MGMT 5140.404Organizational Behavior and AnalysisSpring 8W2 2025
DBAS 6005.501Quantitative Research Method IIFall 2024
MGMT 6100.001Seminar in Organizational BehaviorFall 2024

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MGMT 5140.402Organizational Behavior and AnalysisSummer 5W1 2024 SPOT
MGMT 5710.401Seminar in Business Ethics and Social ResponsibilitySummer 3W1 2024 SPOT
MGMT 5710.402Seminar in Business Ethics and Social ResponsibilitySummer 5W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 6900.001Special ProblemsSummer 10W 2024
MGMT 5140.002Organizational Behavior and AnalysisSpring 8W1 2024 SPOT
MGMT 5140.003Organizational Behavior and AnalysisSpring 8W2 2024 SPOT
MGMT 5140.003Organizational Behavior and AnalysisFall 8W1 2023 SPOT
MGMT 5710.003Seminar in Business Ethics and Social ResponsibilityFall 8W2 2023 SPOT
MGMT 5140.004Organizational Behavior and AnalysisSummer 5W2 2023 SPOT
MGMT 5140.003Organizational Behavior and AnalysisSpring 8W2 2023 SPOT
MGMT 5710.002Seminar in Business Ethics and Social ResponsibilitySpring 8W2 2023 SPOT
MGMT 5140.003Organizational Behavior and AnalysisFall 8W2 2022 SPOT
MGMT 6900.702Special ProblemsFall 2022
MGMT 5140.001Organizational Behavior and AnalysisSummer 3W1 2022 SPOT
MGMT 5140.003Organizational Behavior and AnalysisSpring 8W2 2022 SPOT
MGMT 5710.002Seminar in Business Ethics and Social ResponsibilitySpring 8W1 2022 SPOT
MGMT 5140.002Organizational Behavior and AnalysisFall 8W2 2021 SPOT
MGMT 5710.001Seminar in Business Ethics and Social ResponsibilityFall 8W2 2021 SPOT
MGMT 5710.026Seminar in Business Ethics and Social ResponsibilityFall 8W2 2021
MGMT 5140.002Organizational Behavior and AnalysisSummer 5W2 2021 SPOT
MGMT 5140.026Organizational Behavior and AnalysisSummer 5W2 2021 SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Conference Proceeding

  • Jordan, S.L., Boulamatsi, A., Vaziri, H., Annamalai, D.C., Kidwell, V., Hancock, J.I. (2022). To mask or not to mask? Examining the daily antecedents and consequences of mask-wearing decisions at work.
  • Journal Article

  • Zhang, L., Van Iddekinge, C., Polyhart, R., Arnold, J., Jordan, S.L. (2023). The definition and measurement of human capital resources: A content and meta-analytic review.. Journal of Applied Psychology.
  • Babalola, M., Jordan, S.L., Ren, S., Ogbonnaya, C., Hochwarter, W., Soetan, G. (2023). How and when perceptions of top management bottom-line mentality inhibit supervisors’ servant leadership behavior.. Journal of Management.
  • Hochwarter, W., Jordan, S.L., Kapoutsis, I., Franczak, J., Babalola, M., Karim Khan, A., Li, Y. (2023). Sometimes enough is enough: Nurses’ nonlinear levels of passion and the influence of politics.. Human Relations.
  • McCartney, J., Franczak, J., Gonzalez, K., Hall, A., Hochwarter, W., Jordan, S.L., Wickham, W., Khan, A., Babalola, M. (2023). Supervisor off-work boundary infringements: Perspective-taking as a resource for after-hours communications. Work & Stress.
  • Hochwarter, W., Jordan, S.L., Fontes-Comber, A., Karim Khan, A., Babalola, M., De La Haye, D., Deng, Y., Babalola, M., Karim Khan, A. (2022). Losing the benefits of work passion? The implications of low ego-resilience for passionate workers..
  • Jordan, S., Palmer, J., Daniels, S., Hochwarter, W., Perrewé, P., Ferris, G. (2022). Subjectivity in fairness perceptions: How heuristics and self-efficacy shape the fairness expectations and perceptions of organizational newcomers. Applied Psychology. 71 103-128.
  • Chawla, N., Gabriel, A., Rosen, C., Evans, J., Koopman, J., Hochwarter, W., Palmer, J., Jordan, S. (2021). A person-centered view of impression management, inauthenticity, and employee behavior. Personnel Psychology. 74 657-691.
  • Wang, G., Steffensen, D., Perrewé, P., Ferris, G., Jordan, S. (2021). Does leader same-sex sexual orientation matter to leadership effectiveness? A four-study model-testing investigation. Journal of Business And Psychology.
  • Hochwarter, W., Rosen, C., Jordan, S.L., Ferris, G., Ejaz, A., Maher, L. (2020). Perceptions of organizational politics research: Past, present, and future..
  • Zhang, L., Van Iddekinge, C., Arnold, J., Roth, P., Lievens, F., Lanivich, S., Jordan, S.L. (2020). What’s on job seekers’ social media sites? A content analysis and effects of structure on recruiter judgments and predictive validity..

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Jordan, S.L. (Principal), Vaziri , H. (Co-Principal), Annamalai, D.C. (Co-Principal), Kidwell, V.N. (Co-Principal), Hancock, J.I. (Co-Principal), Boulamatsi, A. (Co-Principal), "To mask or not to mask? Examining the daily antecedents and consequences of mask-wearing decisions at work," sponsored by Division of Research and Innovation, University of North Texas, $10000 Funded. (2022).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE