Faculty Profile

Samantha Jordan

Title
Assistant Professor
Department
Management
College
College of Business
Assistant Professor
Management
College of Business

    

Education

PhD, Florida State University, 2021.
Major: Business Administration - Management
Degree Specialization: Organizational Behavior and Human Resources
Dissertation Title: Politics got you down? Intraindividual variability in perceptions of organizational politics and unmet motivational strivings at work
BS, University of Florida, 2015.
Major: Psychology

Current Scheduled Teaching*

MGMT 5140.402, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Summer 2024
MGMT 5710.401, Seminar in Business Ethics and Social Responsibility, Summer 2024
MGMT 5710.402, Seminar in Business Ethics and Social Responsibility, Summer 2024
MGMT 6900.001, Special Problems, Summer 2024
MGMT 5140.002, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Spring 2024 Syllabus
MGMT 5140.003, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Spring 2024 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

MGMT 5140.003, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Fall 8W1 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5710.003, Seminar in Business Ethics and Social Responsibility, Fall 8W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5140.004, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Summer 5W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5140.003, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Spring 8W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5710.002, Seminar in Business Ethics and Social Responsibility, Spring 8W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5140.003, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Fall 8W2 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 6900.702, Special Problems, Fall 2022 Syllabus
MGMT 5140.001, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Summer 3W1 2022 SPOT
MGMT 5140.003, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Spring 8W2 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5710.002, Seminar in Business Ethics and Social Responsibility, Spring 8W1 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5140.002, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Fall 8W2 2021 SPOT
MGMT 5710.001, Seminar in Business Ethics and Social Responsibility, Fall 8W2 2021 SPOT
MGMT 5710.026, Seminar in Business Ethics and Social Responsibility, Fall 8W2 2021
MGMT 5140.002, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Summer 5W2 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5140.026, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Summer 5W2 2021 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Publications

Published Intellectual Contributions

Conference Proceeding
Jordan, S. L., Boulamatsi, A., Vaziri, H., Annamalai, D. C., Kidwell, V., Hancock, J. I. (2022). To mask or not to mask? Examining the daily antecedents and consequences of mask-wearing decisions at work.
Journal Article
Zhang, L., Van Iddekinge, C., Polyhart, R., Arnold, J., Jordan, S. L. (2023). The definition and measurement of human capital resources: A content and meta-analytic review.. Journal of Applied Psychology.
Babalola, M., Jordan, S. L., Ren, S., Ogbonnaya, C., Hochwarter, W., Soetan, G. (2023). How and when perceptions of top management bottom-line mentality inhibit supervisors’ servant leadership behavior.. Journal of Management.
Hochwarter, W., Jordan, S. L., Kapoutsis, I., Franczak, J., Babalola, M., Karim Khan, A., Li, Y. (2023). Sometimes enough is enough: Nurses’ nonlinear levels of passion and the influence of politics.. Human Relations.
McCartney, J., Franczak, J., Gonzalez, K., Hall, A., Hochwarter, W., Jordan, S. L., Wickham, W., Khan, A., Babalola, M. (2023). Supervisor off-work boundary infringements: Perspective-taking as a resource for after-hours communications. Work & Stress.
Hochwarter, W., Jordan, S. L., Fontes-Comber, A., Karim Khan, A., Babalola, M., De La Haye, D., Deng, Y., Babalola, M., Karim Khan, A. (2022). Losing the benefits of work passion? The implications of low ego-resilience for passionate workers..
Jordan, S., Palmer, J., Daniels, S., Hochwarter, W., Perrewé, P., Ferris, G. (2022). Subjectivity in fairness perceptions: How heuristics and self-efficacy shape the fairness expectations and perceptions of organizational newcomers. Applied Psychology. 71, 103-128.
Chawla, N., Gabriel, A., Rosen, C., Evans, J., Koopman, J., Hochwarter, W., Palmer, J., Jordan, S. (2021). A person-centered view of impression management, inauthenticity, and employee behavior. Personnel Psychology. 74, 657-691.
Wang, G., Steffensen, D., Perrewé, P., Ferris, G., Jordan, S. (2021). Does leader same-sex sexual orientation matter to leadership effectiveness? A four-study model-testing investigation. Journal of Business And Psychology.
Hochwarter, W., Rosen, C., Jordan, S. L., Ferris, G., Ejaz, A., Maher, L. (2020). Perceptions of organizational politics research: Past, present, and future..
Zhang, L., Van Iddekinge, C., Arnold, J., Roth, P., Lievens, F., Lanivich, S., Jordan, S. L. (2020). What’s on job seekers’ social media sites? A content analysis and effects of structure on recruiter judgments and predictive validity..

Awarded Grants

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

Grant - Research
Jordan, S. L. (Principal), Vaziri, H. (Co-Principal), Annamalai, D. C. (Co-Principal), Kidwell, V. N. (Co-Principal), Hancock, J. I. (Co-Principal), Boulamatsi, A. (Co-Principal), "To mask or not to mask? Examining the daily antecedents and consequences of mask-wearing decisions at work," Sponsored by Division of Research and Innovation, University of North Texas, $10000 Funded. (2022 – Present).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE