Skip to main content

Samuel Muwanguzi

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Information Science

College: College of Information

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2014
    Major: Information Science
  • MA, University of North Texas, 2005
    Major: Communication Studies

Current Scheduled Teaching

INFO 5737.021Information and Cyber SecuritySpring 2025
INFO 5814.401Website Content Development and MaintenanceSpring 2025
INFO 5737.022Information and Cyber SecurityFall 2024
INFO 5814.401Website Content Development and MaintenanceFall 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

INFO 5814.001Website Content Development and MaintenanceSummer 5W2 2024 SPOT
INFO 5737.021Information and Cyber SecuritySpring 2024 SPOT
INFO 5814.001Website Content Development and MaintenanceSpring 2024 SPOT
INFO 5814.001Website Content Development and MaintenanceFall 2023 SPOT
INFO 5814.001Website Content Development and MaintenanceSummer 5W2 2023 SPOT
INFO 5814.001Website Content Development and MaintenanceSpring 2023 SPOT
INFO 5814.001Website Content Development and MaintenanceFall 2022 SPOT
INFO 5814.001Website Content Development and MaintenanceSummer 5W2 2022 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE