Skip to main content

Sitong Meng

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Keyboard Studies

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • Diploma (International), Royal Northern College of Music - England, 2019
    Major: Performance

Current Scheduled Teaching

MUAG 1012.504Keyboard Skills for Music MajorsSpring 2026 Syllabus
MUAG 1012.509Keyboard Skills for Music MajorsSpring 2026 Syllabus
MUAC 1501.713PIANOSpring 2026
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MUAG 1012.507Keyboard Skills for Music MajorsFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 1013.502Keyboard Skills for Music MajorsFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 1013.510Keyboard Skills for Music MajorsFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MUAC 1501.713PIANOFall 2025 SPOT
MUAG 1012.510Keyboard Skills for Music MajorsSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 1012.512Keyboard Skills for Music MajorsSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MUAC 1501.713PIANOSpring 2025 SPOT
MUAS 1501.713PianoSpring 2025 SPOT
MUAG 1011.503Keyboard Skills for Music MajorsFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 1011.512Keyboard Skills for Music MajorsFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUAC 1501.713PIANOFall 2024 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE