Skip to main content

Staci Gentry

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: English

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MA, University of North Texas, 2024
    Major: English
  • BA, University of North Texas, 2022
    Major: English - Literature

Current Scheduled Teaching

ENGL 1310.204First Year Writing ISpring 2026
ENGL 1310.722First Year Writing ISpring 2026
ENGL 1310.040First Year Writing IFall 2025 Syllabus
ENGL 1310.218First Year Writing IFall 2025 Syllabus
ENGL 1320.006First Year Writing IIFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ENGL 1310.020First Year Writing ISpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.042First Year Writing ISpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.218First Year Writing IFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.235First Year Writing IFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1320.006First Year Writing IIFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.209First Year Writing ISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.210First Year Writing IFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TSIW 1300Z.210Integrated Reading/Writing NCBOFall 2023
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE