Skip to main content

Sohaila Rahman

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Kinesiology, Health Promotion and Recreation

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2023
    Major: Kinesiology
    Dissertation: The Experiences of Young Adult-Aged Women from South Asian Countries Attempting to Participate in Sport and Physical Activity in the United States
  • BEd, Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, 2019
    Major: Teacher Education
  • MS, University of the Punjab, Lahore, 2016
    Major: Physical Education

Current Scheduled Teaching

KINE 3020.001Movement for Individuals with DisabilitiesSpring 2026
KINE 3020.301Movement for Individuals with DisabilitiesSpring 2026
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

PHED 1000.403Scientific Principles and Practices of Health Related FitnessFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE