Skip to main content

Susan V. Bradley

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Accounting

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • EdD, University of Arkansas,
    Major: Adult Education
    Dissertation: Working Title: The Impact of Online Misinformation on Women's Self-Directed Healthcare Learning
  • MBA, Southern Methodist University, 1993
    Major: International Business
  • BS, University of Arkansas, 1984
    Major: Marketing

Current Scheduled Teaching

ACCT 3405.001Professional DevelopmentFall 2026
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ACCT 3405.001Professional DevelopmentSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 3405.001Professional DevelopmentFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 3405.001Professional DevelopmentSummer 5W1 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 3405.001Professional DevelopmentSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 3405.002Professional DevelopmentSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 3405.002Professional DevelopmentFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 3405.001Professional DevelopmentSummer 5W1 2020 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 3405.001Professional DevelopmentSpring 2020 Syllabus
ACCT 3405.002Professional DevelopmentSpring 2020 Syllabus
ACCT 3405.002Professional DevelopmentFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE