Skip to main content

Taylor Matthys

Title: Visiting Lecturer

Department: Economics

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2025
    Major: Economics
  • BS, University of North Texas, 2022
    Major: Economics

Current Scheduled Teaching

ECON 1110.465Principles of MacroeconomicsSpring 8W2 2026
ECON 1100.006Principles of MicroeconomicsSpring 2026
ECON 1100.020Principles of MicroeconomicsSpring 2026
ECON 1100.022Principles of MicroeconomicsSpring 2026
ECON 1100.002Principles of MicroeconomicsFall 2025 Syllabus
ECON 1100.006Principles of MicroeconomicsFall 2025 Syllabus
ECON 1100.014Principles of MicroeconomicsFall 2025 Syllabus
ECON 1100.036Principles of MicroeconomicsFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ECON 3560.001Intermediate Macro TheorySummer 5W2 2025 Syllabus SPOT
ECON 3550.001Intermediate Micro TheorySummer 5W1 2025 Syllabus SPOT
ECON 1110.005Principles of MacroeconomicsSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
ECON 1110.011Principles of MacroeconomicsFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE