Skip to main content

Tiffany Newsome

Title: Lecturer

Department: Teacher Education and Administration

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • EdD, University of North Carolina -Greensboro, 2022
    Major: Educational Leadership
    Dissertation: Meeting the Career Development Needs of Black Women Aspiring to Become Principals
  • MSA, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2017
    Major: School Administration
  • BA, Wake Forest University, 2013
    Major: English

Current Scheduled Teaching

EDLE 5330.485Instructional LeadershipSpring 8W1 2025
EDLE 5650.480Professional Development and SupervisionSpring 8W2 2025
EDLE 5650.480Professional Development and SupervisionFall 8W2 2024
EDLE 5650.481Professional Development and SupervisionFall 8W2 2024
EDLE 5600.481Race, Class and Gender Issues in EducationFall 8W1 2024
EDLE 5600.485Race, Class and Gender Issues in EducationFall 8W1 2024

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDLE 5330.085Instructional LeadershipSpring 8W1 2024 SPOT
EDLE 5650.080Professional Development and SupervisionSpring 8W2 2024 SPOT
EDLE 5650.082Professional Development and SupervisionSpring 8W2 2024 SPOT
EDLE 5650.080Professional Development and SupervisionFall 8W2 2023 SPOT
EDLE 5650.081Professional Development and SupervisionFall 8W2 2023 SPOT
EDLE 5600.082Race, Class and Gender Issues in EducationFall 8W1 2023 SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Manuscript

  • Newsome, T.A. Meeting the Career Development Needs of Black Women Aspiring to Become Principals. 157. https://www.proquest.com/openview/330e66f35dc972a265291ae2862ddd92/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE