Skip to main content

Troy Perkins

Title: Lecturer

Department: Media Arts

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MFA, New York University, 2000
    Major: Film and Television

Current Scheduled Teaching

MRTS 3400.001Intermediate ScreenwritingFall 2024 Syllabus
MRTS 3400.002Intermediate ScreenwritingFall 2024 Syllabus
MRTS 2010.002Introduction to Media Arts WritingFall 2024 Syllabus
MRTS 2010.402Introduction to Media Arts WritingFall 2024 Syllabus
MRTS 4460.100Intermediate ScreenwritingSummer 10W 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 2010.100Introduction to Media Arts WritingSummer 5W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MRTS 4460.100Intermediate ScreenwritingSummer 10W 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 2010.100Introduction to Media Arts WritingSummer 5W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 4460.001Intermediate ScreenwritingSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 4460.002Intermediate ScreenwritingSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 2010.002Introduction to Media Arts WritingSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 2010.101Introduction to Media Arts WritingSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 2010.102Introduction to Media Arts WritingSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 4460.002Intermediate ScreenwritingFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 2010.002Introduction to Media Arts WritingFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 2010.102Introduction to Media Arts WritingFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 2010.103Introduction to Media Arts WritingFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE