Skip to main content

Thomas Brindle

Title: Clinical Associate Professor

Department: Multidisciplinary Innovation

College: College of Applied and Collaborative Studies

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of Texas at Dallas, 2016
    Major: Supply Chain Management

Current Scheduled Teaching

INDS 3060.501Complexity and System DynamicsFall 2024 Syllabus
ADAR 4980.501Experimental CourseFall 2024 Syllabus
INDS 3020.501Industrial Channel SellingFall 2024 Syllabus
ADAR 4120.530Mixed Methods ResearchFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

INDS 4020.601Industrial Channel StrategySpring 2024 Syllabus
INDS 2030.501Industrial Computer Science and InformaticsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
INDS 2050.601Industrial Cost ManagementSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
INDS 3060.501Complex and Systemic ThinkingFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
INDS 2001.501Thinkubator in Industrial Distribution IIFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
INDS 3001.501Thinkubator in Industrial Distribution IIIFall 2023 Syllabus
INDS 4001.501Thinkubator in Industrial Distribution IVFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
INDS 2030.501Industrial Computer Science and InformaticsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
INDS 2050.501Industrial Cost ManagementSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ACSO 4120.530Mixed Methods ResearchSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
INDS 3020.501Industrial Channel SellingFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ACSO 4020.531Process Optimization and Prescriptive AnalysisFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
INDS 3001.501Thinkubator in Industrial Distribution IIIFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Chapter

  • Brindle, T., Huang, S., Wu, H., Lin, C., Lu, J., Lindell, M.K., Davis, C.A., Yu, K., Taciroglu, E. (2022). Households’ Protective Actions in Response to a Nighttime Earthquake: The 2018 Eastern Taiwan Earthquake. Lifelines 2022: Advancing Lifeline Engineering for Community Resilience. (1) 397-410. Reston, VA, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Press.

    • Cited Research

  • Brindle, T.R. (2023). Using Industry Sector Entropy to Predict Economic Community Disaster Resilience: Real-world Verification from the COVID-19 Pandemic. https://digitalcommons.jsu.edu/etds_dissertations/19/

    • Journal Article

  • Brindle, T.R. (2023). What captures attention in the risk communication process: Exploring streaming video attractiveness during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Computers in Human Behavior. 149 (December 2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107909

    • Technical Report

  • , Brindle, T. RAPID/Collaborative Research: Households' Immediate Protective Actions and Trade-Off Processes Between Property Security and Life Safety in Response to 2022 Hurricane Ian (NSF Award Number (FAIN): 2303579; serving as research assistant). https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2303579&HistoricalAwards=false
  • Brindle, T. (2022). Households’ Protective Actions in Response to a Nighttime Earthquake: The 2018 Eastern Taiwan Earthquake. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/9780784484449.035
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE