Skip to main content

Tanmay Bera

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Computer Science and Engineering

College: College of Engineering

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Central Florida, 2012
    Major: Materials Science and Engineering
    Dissertation: Developing surface engineered liquid crystal droplets for sensing applications
  • MS, University of Central Florida, 2010
    Major: Materials Science and Engineering

Current Scheduled Teaching

CSCE 3214.001Software Development for Artificial IntelligenceSpring 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

CSCE 5210.005Fundamentals of Artificial IntelligenceFall 2024 SPOT
CSCE 5210.005Fundamentals of Artificial IntelligenceSummer 10W 2024 SPOT
CSCE 3201.400Applied Artificial IntelligenceSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
CSCE 5210.003Fundamentals of Artificial IntelligenceSpring 2024 SPOT
CSCE 5933.008Topics in Computer Science and EngineeringSpring 2024 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE