Skip to main content

Todd C. Enoch

Title: Associate Librarian

Department: Library - CM - Collection Development

College: University of North Texas

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MLS, Univeristy of North Texas, 2005
    Major: Library and Information Science
  • BA, Oklahoma State University, 1997
    Major: English

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Chapter

  • Enoch, T.C. (2017). ERM Migration. Migrating Library Data: A Practical Manual. American Library Association.

    • Conference Proceeding

  • Enoch, T.C., Staines, H., Liburd Tavernier , W., Wickham, A. (2023). Launch of the NASIG Model Digital Preservation Policy. NASIG Proceedings. 37 287-291. Ann Arbor, Michigan, Michigan Publishing. https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/nasig/article/id/4326/
  • Harker, K.R., Enoch, T.C., Crawford, L.S. (2015). Keeping it Real: A Comprehensive and Transparent Evaluation of Electronic Resources. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2014/Collection/7/

    • Conference Report

  • Enoch, T.C., Spiller, J. (2015). Metadata for Metahumans: An Introduction to Comic Book Markup. Against the Grain. 27 (6) 63.
  • Enoch, T.C., Henderson, K., White, M. (2015). Services, and technology Driving Change: How Librarians Publishers and Vendors are Moving Forward. Against the Grain. 27 (3) 79.

    • Instruction manual

  • Crawford, L.S., Harker, K.R., Enoch, T.C. Tower Cakes for Ranking Subscription Resources. Assessment Cookbook.

    • Journal Article

  • Enoch, T., Clark, J.L., Perera, T., Pun, R., Kim, M., Twardowski, K. Equity and Inclusion Panel. The Serials Librarian. 82 (1-4) 13-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2022.2028502
  • Enoch, T. (2021). Getting on the Same Page: Aligning ERM and LibGuides Content. The Serials Librarian. Taylor & Francis. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0361526X.2021.1872015
  • Condrey, C., Crawford, L.S., Avery, E.F., Enoch, T.C. (2020). Implementing a just-in-time collection development model in an academic library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 46 (2) 9 p. Oxford, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102101
  • Enoch, T.C., Rosenfeld, J. (2019). Beyond Set it and Forget it: Proactively Managing Your EZproxy Server. The Serials Librarian. 76 (1-4) 30-34. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2019.1551041
  • Enoch, T.C. (2018). Tracking Down the Problem: The Development of a Web –Scale Discovery Troubleshooting Workflow. The Serials Librarian. 74 (1-4) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0361526X.2018.1427984
  • Enoch, T.C., Leffler, J., Hayden, J. (2017). Juggling a New Format with Existing Tools: Incorporating Streaming Video into Technical Services Workflows. Other. 72 (1-4) p.102-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2017.1284498
  • Enoch, T.C., Henley, M. (2016). Finding the Target: An Experiment in Benchmarking. Other. 70 (1-4) 217-223. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0361526X.2016.1156963
  • Enoch, T.C., Harker, K.R. (2015). Planning for the Budget-ocalypse: The Evolution of a Serials/ER Cancellation Methodology.. Other. 68 (1-4) 282-289. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0361526X.2015.1025657#
  • Enoch, T.C., Rathmel, A., Currie, L. (2015). “Big Deals” and Squeaky Wheels: Taking Stock of Your Stats. Other. 68 (1-4) 26-37. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0361526X.2015.1013754#
  • Enoch, T.C. (2014). Preparation is Key: Lessons Learned from an ERMS Implementation. Other. 66 (1-4) 182-188. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0361526X.2014.877276

    • Research Report

  • Crawford, L.S., Avery, B., Harker, K.R., Enoch, T.C., Condrey, C. (2015). White Paper: Redefining Collection Development at University of North Texas Libraries. z687. http://www.ala.org/alcts/resources/z687/redefine
  • Crawford, L.S., Avery, E.F., Harker, K.R., Enoch, T.C., Condrey, C. (2014). White Paper: Redefining Collection Development at University of North Texas Libraries. UNT Digital Library. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc335286/
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE