Skip to main content

Tresia Eaves

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Information Technology and Decision Sciences

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2020
    Major: Information Science
    Specialization: NA
    Dissertation: Information Seeking Behaviors of Transitioning Veterans When Job Hunting in North Texas
  • MA, University of Oklahoma, 1995
    Major: Organizational Behavior
    Specialization: NA
    Dissertation: NA
  • BA, Baylor University, 1992
    Major: Computer Science
    Specialization: NA
    Dissertation: NA

Current Scheduled Teaching

BCIS 5150.402Leveraging Information Technology for BusinessFall 8W1 2024

Previous Scheduled Teaching

DSCI 5360.001Data VisualizationSpring 2024 SPOT
DSCI 5360.003Data VisualizationSpring 2024 SPOT
DTSC 5502.001Principles and Techniques for Data ScienceSpring 2024 SPOT
DSCI 5360.004Data VisualizationFall 2023 SPOT
DTSC 5502.001Principles and Techniques for Data ScienceFall 2023 SPOT
BCIS 5660.001Organizing and Managing IT ProjectsSpring 2023 SPOT
INFO 5502.001Principles and Techniques for Data ScienceSpring 2023 SPOT
INFO 5501.002Fundamentals of Data AnalyticsFall 2022 SPOT
BCIS 5150.004Leveraging Information Technology for BusinessFall 2022 SPOT
ADTA 5250.501Large Data VisualizationFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Conference Proceeding

  • Eaves, T. (2019). Information seeking behaviors of transitioning USAF officers when job hunting in North Texas. iConference 2019 Proceedings. iSchools. http://dx.doi.org/10.21900/iconf.2019.103306
  • Journal Article

  • Khader, M., Allen, J.M., Njeri, M., Zimmerman, T., Rosellini, A., Eaves, T. (2020). Impact of cultural and religious literacy: Implications for information literacy. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 57 (1) Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pra2.379
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE