Skip to main content

Trina Harlow

Title: Lecturer

Department: Art Education

College: College of Visual Arts and Design

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Kansas State University, 2019
    Major: Curriculum & Instruction
    Dissertation: I Am Me: Using buoyant biopsychosocial art education curriculum and storybords to explore self-esteem with sixth grade students
  • MA, Boston University, 2013
    Major: Art Education
  • BS, Kansas State University, 1984
    Major: Clothing and Textiles (Apparel Design)
  • Certificate, Paris Fashion Institute, 1984
    Major: Fashion Design

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDEE 4101.760Clinical TeachingSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ARTE 5775.001Feminist Perspectives on Art, Research, and TeachingSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ART 4900.761Special ProblemsSpring 2024 Syllabus
EDEE 5101.754Student Teaching in EC through Grade 6Spring 2024
EDCI 5108.757Student Teaching in the Secondary SchoolsSpring 2024
EDCI 4138.753Student Teaching Secondary School ArtSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ARTE 4750.001Art Education: Elementary Art Education PracticesFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ARTE 4780.001Art Education: Secondary Art Education PracticesFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 4101.762Clinical TeachingFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4138.752Student Teaching Secondary School ArtFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ARTE 5750.002Theory and Practice of Teaching Elementary and Secondary ArtFall 2023 SPOT
ARTE 5774.001Visual Culture Theories & PedagogySpring 2023 SPOT
ARTE 5772.001Critical Art EducationFall 2022 SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE