Skip to main content

Tekeisha D. Zimmerman

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Learning Technologies

College: College of Information

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2015
    Major: Applied Technology and Performance Improvement
    Dissertation: Testing the Psychometric Properties of the Online Student Connectedness
  • MBA, Nova Southeastern University, 2009
    Major: Business/ HR Management
  • BA, Nova Southeastern University, 2006
    Major: Business

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

LTEC 5670.420Distributed LeadershipFall 2024 SPOT
LTEC 4070.420Principles of Leadership, Empowerment and Team BuildingFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
LTEC 4000.020Principles of Training and DevelopmentFall 2014 Syllabus
LTEC 4000.021Principles of Training and DevelopmentFall 2014 Syllabus
LTEC 4510.021Communications in Business, Education and IndustrySummer 10W 2014
LTEC 4000.022Principles of Training and DevelopmentSpring 2014 Syllabus
LTEC 3010.030Personal DevelopmentFall 2013
LTEC 4000.022Principles of Training and DevelopmentFall 2013
LTEC 4000.022Principles of Training and DevelopmentSpring 2013
LTEC 4000.023Principles of Training and DevelopmentSpring 2013
LTEC 4200.020Performance Improvement in Education and TrainingFall 2012 Syllabus
LTEC 3010.025Personal DevelopmentFall 2012
LTEC 3010.022Personal DevelopmentSpring 2012 Syllabus
LTEC 3010.022Personal DevelopmentFall 2011 Syllabus
LTEC 3010.021Personal DevelopmentSpring 2011 Syllabus
LTEC 3010.025Personal DevelopmentSpring 2011 Syllabus
LTEC 3010.022Personal DevelopmentFall 2010 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Tekeisha Zimmerman. (2013). A change is gonna come: Factors affecting organizational identity threat following an acquisition.
  • Tekeisha Zimmerman. (2013). Tacit knowledge in post bureaucratic organizations.
  • Tekeisha Zimmerman. (2012). Accepted/In Press You had me at hello: Towards a framework for onboarding virtual employees.
  • Tekeisha Zimmerman. (2012). Exploring Learner to Content Interaction as a Success Factor in Online Courses.
  • John Turner/ Tekeisha Zimmerman/Jeff Allen. (2012). Teams as a Process for Knowledge Management.
  • Turner, J.R., Zimmerman, T.D., Allen, J.M. (2012). Teams as a sub-process for knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management. 16 (6) 963-977.

    • Magazine/Trade Publication

  • Tekeisha Zimmerman. (2012). Google Scholar as an HRD Tool.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE