Skip to main content

Taneekwa Hurdle

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Management

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MEd, Angelo State University, 2018
    Major: Student Development and Leadership

Current Scheduled Teaching

BUSI 1200.011Professional Development I Strategies for BusinessSpring 8W1 2025
BUSI 1200.027Professional Development I Strategies for BusinessSpring 8W2 2025
BUSI 1200.014Professional Development I Strategies for BusinessFall 8W1 2024 Syllabus
BUSI 1200.030Professional Development I Strategies for BusinessFall 8W2 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

BUSI 1200.008Professional Development I Strategies for BusinessSpring 8W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 1200.012Professional Development I Strategies for BusinessSpring 8W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 1200.024Professional Development I Strategies for BusinessSpring 8W2 2024 SPOT
BUSI 1200.028Professional Development I Strategies for BusinessSpring 8W2 2024 SPOT
BUSI 1200.007Professional Development I Strategies for BusinessFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE