Skip to main content

Tae Hee Lee

Title: Clinical Assistant Professor

Department: Information Science

College: College of Information

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2023
    Major: Information Studies
    Dissertation: Information Needs of korean Immigrants in the United States: Selection and Use of Social Media

Current Scheduled Teaching

INFO 5709.401Data Visualization and CommunicationSpring 2025
INFO 5737.022Information and Cyber SecuritySpring 2025
INFO 5000.402Information and Knowledge ProfessionsSpring 2025
INFO 5306.401Project Management for Information SystemsSpring 2025
INFO 5306.451Project Management for Information SystemsSpring 2025
INFO 5080.020Research Methods and AnalysisSpring 2025
INFO 5737.020Information and Cyber SecurityFall 2024
INFO 5000.401Information and Knowledge ProfessionsFall 2024
INFO 5306.401Project Management for Information SystemsFall 2024

Previous Scheduled Teaching

INFO 5000.002Information and Knowledge ProfessionsSummer 5W2 2024 SPOT
INFO 5000.004Information and Knowledge ProfessionsSummer 5W2 2024 SPOT
INFO 5000.005Information and Knowledge ProfessionsSummer 5W1 2024 SPOT
INFO 4206.001Information Retrieval SystemsSummer 5W2 2024 SPOT
INFO 5306.002Project Management for Information SystemsSummer 10W 2024 SPOT
INFO 5737.023Information and Cyber SecuritySpring 2024 SPOT
INFO 5000.002Information and Knowledge ProfessionsSpring 2024 SPOT
INFO 5737.023Information and Cyber SecurityFall 2023 SPOT
INFO 5000.001Information and Knowledge ProfessionsFall 2023 SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE