Skip to main content

Tracey M. Filbeck

Title: Lecturer

Department: Design

College: College of Visual Arts and Design

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MArch, University of Texas at Arlington, 2002
    Major: Architecture

Current Scheduled Teaching

ADES 2630.501Drawing for Interior DesignSpring 2025
ADES 2630.502Drawing for Interior DesignSpring 2025
ADES 2630.504Drawing for Interior DesignSpring 2025
ADES 4625.001Interior Design: Professional PracticeSpring 2025
ADES 3630.501Interior Design: Design Studio IIFall 2024 Syllabus
ADES 3630.502Interior Design: Design Studio IIFall 2024 Syllabus
ADES 1625.001Introduction to Interior DesignFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ADES 2630.501Drawing for Interior DesignSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 2630.502Drawing for Interior DesignSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 2630.504Drawing for Interior DesignSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 4625.001Interior Design: Professional PracticeSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 2640.501Interior Design: Space Planning IFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 2640.502Interior Design: Space Planning IFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 4700.742Professional InternshipFall 2023 Syllabus
ADES 4615.001Topics in Interior DesignFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 2630.506Drawing for Interior DesignSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 4625.001Interior Design: Professional PracticeSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 2630.506Drawing for Interior DesignSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE