Skip to main content

Timothy M. Owner

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Instrumental Studies

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • DMA, University of North Texas, 2023
    Major: Performance - Trombone
    Dissertation: Utility Trombone Playing: A Practical Method for Students to Achieve Mastery Alto, Tenor and Bass Trombone

Current Scheduled Teaching

MUCM 3530.502Brass Chamber MusicFall 2024
MUCM 5530.502Brass Chamber MusicFall 2024
MUCM 5530Z.502Brass Chamber MusicFall 2024
MUAC 1517.701TROMBONEFall 2024
MUAC 3517.701TROMBONEFall 2024
MUAM 1517.701TromboneFall 2024
MUAM 3517.701TromboneFall 2024
MUAM 5517.701TromboneFall 2024
MUAM 6517.701TromboneFall 2024

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MUAC 1517.702TROMBONEFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUCM 3530.506Brass Chamber MusicSpring 2022 SPOT
MUAC 1517.707TROMBONESpring 2022 SPOT
MUAC 3517.707TROMBONESpring 2022 SPOT
MUAS 1517.707TromboneSpring 2022 SPOT
MUAC 1517.707TROMBONEFall 2021 SPOT
MUAC 3517.707TROMBONEFall 2021 SPOT
MUAS 1517.707TromboneFall 2021 SPOT
MUAC 1517.707TROMBONESpring 2021 SPOT
MUAC 3517.707TROMBONESpring 2021 SPOT
MUAS 1517.707TromboneSpring 2021 SPOT
MUAC 1517.707TROMBONEFall 2020 SPOT
MUAC 3517.707TROMBONEFall 2020 SPOT
MUAC 1517.707TROMBONESpring 2020
MUAC 3517.707TROMBONESpring 2020
MUAS 1517.707TromboneSpring 2020
MUAS 3517.707TromboneSpring 2020
MUAC 1517.707TROMBONEFall 2019 SPOT
MUAC 3517.707TROMBONEFall 2019 SPOT
MUAS 1517.707TromboneFall 2019 SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE