Faculty Profile

Takeshi Nishikawa

Title
Associate Professor
Department
Finance, Insurance, Real Estate and Law
College
College of Business

    

Education

PhD, Texas Tech University, 2003.
Major: Business Administration
Degree Specialization: Finance
Dissertation Title: Does wealth expropriation really exist in corporate decisions? Re-examination of stock repurchases
MS, Texas Tech University, 1998.
Major: Finance
Degree Specialization: Finance
BS, Georgia Southern University, 1995.
Major: Restaurant, Hotel, and Institutional Management
Degree Specialization: Restaurant, Hotel, and Institutional Management

Current Scheduled Teaching*

FINA 5210.002, Investment Analysis and Management, Fall 2019 Syllabus
FINA 4310.002, Valuation and Financial Decisions, Fall 2019 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

FINA 4200.002, Investments, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 6018.001, Seminar in Econometrics Methods Applied in Financial Markets Research, Spring 2019 SPOT
FINA 5210.002, Investment Analysis and Management, Fall 2018 SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE