Skip to main content

Tamara N. Iliff

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Counseling and Higher Education

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2022
    Major: Counseling
    Dissertation: Counselors' Experiences: Training and Use of Standardized Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Tests in Play Therapy Practice

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

COUN 5670.400Developmental Processes and StrategiesFall 2024 SPOT
COUN 5670.001Developmental Processes and StrategiesSummer 10W 2024 SPOT
COUN 5670.020Developmental Processes and StrategiesSpring 2024 SPOT
COUN 5480.020Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in CounselingSpring 2024 SPOT
COUN 5660.002Advanced Counseling SkillsFall 2023 SPOT
COUN 5670.001Developmental Processes and StrategiesFall 2023 SPOT
COUN 5680.002Essential Skills in CounselingFall 2023 SPOT
COUN 5760.001Appraisal in Child and Adolescent CounselingSummer 10W 2023 SPOT
COUN 5670.001Developmental Processes and StrategiesSummer 10W 2023 SPOT
COUN 5760.001Appraisal in Child and Adolescent CounselingSpring 2023 SPOT
COUN 5680.002Essential Skills in CounselingSpring 2023 SPOT
COUN 3620.001Principles of Counseling IIFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Chapter

  • Ceballos, P., Iliff, T. (2022). Integrating Social Justice Advocacy In Play Therapy. In Multicultural Play Therapy: Making the Most of Cultural Opportunities with Children. 44-62. New York: NY, Routledge.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE