Skip to main content

Teresa McKinney

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Counseling and Higher Education

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • Certificate, Harvard University, 2012
    Major:
    Specialization: Higher Education Performance Assessment
  • EdD, National Louis University, 2011
    Major: Community College Leadership
    Specialization: Higher Education Administration
    Dissertation: Institutional Effectiveness and a Culture of Evidence: Accountability Cornerstones for the Community College in the 21st Century
  • MA, Michigan State University, 2003
    Major: Higher, Adult and Lifelong Education
    Specialization: Teaching & Administration in Higher Education
  • BS, Eastern Michigan University, 1997
    Major: Criminology and Criminal Justice

Current Scheduled Teaching

EDHE 6030.700Practicum, Field Problem or InternshipFall 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDHE 5120.020Student Development Programming AdministrationSpring 2024 SPOT
EDHE 6660.001Seminar in College Student Personnel WorkSummer 8W2 2019 SPOT
EDHE 6730.001Organization and Administration of Student AffairsSpring 2019 SPOT
EDHE 5210.001Student DemographicsFall 2018 SPOT
EDHE 6660.001Seminar in College Student Personnel WorkSummer 8W2 2018 SPOT
EDHE 6660.001Seminar in College Student Personnel WorkSpring 2018 SPOT
UCRS 1100.002Application of Learning FoundationsFall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE