Faculty Profile

Timothy Kincaid

Timothy Kincaid

Title
Adjunct Faculty
Department
Logistics and Operations Management
College
College of Business

    

Education

EdD, The George Washington University, 2010.
Major: Human Resource Development
MBA, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, 1999.
Major: Business Administration
Degree Specialization: Aviation Management
BA, University of Oklahoma, 1980.
Major: Bachelor of Arts
Degree Specialization: Journalist/Mass Communication

Current Scheduled Teaching*

LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Spring 2024 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Spring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Fall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Spring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Fall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Spring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Fall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Spring 2020 Syllabus
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Fall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 2200.001, Professional Development II Critical Thinking and Decision Making in Business, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Fall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Spring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Fall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Spring 2016 Syllabus SPOT
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Fall 2015 Syllabus SPOT
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Spring 2015 Syllabus
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Fall 2014 Syllabus
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Spring 2014
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Fall 2013
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Spring 2013
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Fall 2012
LGAV 3140.001, Air Passenger Planning and Control, Spring 2012

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Publications

Published Intellectual Contributions

Journal Article
Hong, S., Savoie, M., Joiner, S., Kincaid, T. (2022). Analysis of Airline Employees’ Perceptions of Corporate Preparedness for COVID-19 Disruptions to Airline Operations. Other. 119, 45-55. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE