Skip to main content

Ting Wang

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Information Science

College: College of Information

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Emporia State University, 2022
    Major: Library & Information Management
    Specialization: Information Science
  • MS, Emporia State University, 2017
    Major: Instructional Design and Technology
  • MBA, Emporia State University, 2014
    Major: Business Administration
    Specialization: Accounting
  • BA, Dalian Neusoft Institute of Information, China., 2010
    Major: English

Current Scheduled Teaching

INFO 4206.401Information Retrieval SystemsSpring 2025
INFO 4206.401Information Retrieval SystemsFall 2024 Syllabus
INFO 4100.401Introduction to Information SciencesFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

INFO 4709.001Data VisualizationSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4206.001Information Retrieval SystemsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4206.001Information Retrieval SystemsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4100.001Introduction to Information SciencesFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4907.001Data VisualizationSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4206.001Information Retrieval SystemsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE