Skip to main content

Virnin Bonner

Title: Staff

Department: Dean's Office

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

COS 1100.012Science Success SeminarFall 2024 Syllabus
COS 1100.013Science Success SeminarFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

COS 1100.008Science Success SeminarFall 2023 Syllabus
COS 1100.009Science Success SeminarFall 2023 Syllabus
COS 1100.002Science Success SeminarFall 2022 Syllabus
COS 1100.003Science Success SeminarFall 2022 Syllabus
COS 4100.001Career Competency Development SeminarSpring 2022 Syllabus
COS 1100.001Science Success SeminarFall 2021 Syllabus
COS 1100.007Science Success SeminarFall 2021 Syllabus
COS 4980.001Experimental CourseSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
COS 1100.006Science Success SeminarFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
COS 1100.007Science Success SeminarFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
COS 1100.002Science Success SeminarFall 2019 Syllabus
COS 1100.004Science Success SeminarFall 2019 Syllabus
UCRS 1100.004Application of Learning FoundationsFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
UCRS 1100.011Application of Learning FoundationsFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE