Skip to main content

Vickie Gordon

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Educational Psychology

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MEd, Lamar University, 2013
    Major: Counseling and Developmental School Counseling
  • MSW, Tulane University, 1992
    Major: Social Work
  • BA, Baylor University, 1991
    Major: Social Work

Current Scheduled Teaching

SOWK 3500.001Human Behavior and the Social Environment ISpring 2026
SOWK 3000.001Foundations of Interviewing and Interpersonal SkillsFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EPSY 3013.420Reading and Understanding ResearchSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
EPSY 2010.080How People LearnSpring 8W1 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EPSY 2010.090How People LearnSpring 8W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EPSY 2010.007How People LearnFall 8W1 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EPSY 2010.008How People LearnFall 8W2 2022 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Conference Proceeding

  • Gordon, V., Dang, A., Allen, C.D. (2023). After-School Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Shifting Figured Worlds. Savannah, chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://repository.isls.org/bitstream/1/10372/1/ICLS2023_970-973.pdf
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE