Skip to main content

Vidhi Jain

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Management

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MENG, Texas A&M University, 2020
    Major: Industrial Engineering
  • BTech, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 2017
    Major: Electrical Engineering

Current Scheduled Teaching

MGMT 3880.402Business Ethics and Social ResponsibilityFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MGMT 3880.402Business Ethics and Social ResponsibilitySummer 5W1 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 3850.001Foundations of EntrepreneurshipSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 3880.402Business Ethics and Social ResponsibilityFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Chapter

  • Salimath, M.S., Jain, V. The Role of Fin Tech in Financial Inclusion, Poverty Alleviation and Financial Stability. Handbook of Breakthrough Technologies in Contemporary Organisations. 387-397. Singapore, Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Conference Proceeding

  • Jain, V., Salimath, M.S., Pavur, R.J. (2025). Achieving AI Innovation: Culture of Market Responsiveness or Integrity?. Academy of Management Proceedings. Academy of Management.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE