Skip to main content

Victoria M. Gonzalez

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Instrumental Studies

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MMus, University of North Texas, 2023
    Major: Perfomance
    Specialization: Harp

Current Scheduled Teaching

MUAS 1522.702HarpFall 2025 Syllabus
MUAS 1522.703HarpFall 2025 Syllabus
MUCM 3630.500Harp EnsembleFall 2025
MUEN 5630.500Harp EnsembleFall 2025
MULB 1805.502OrchestraFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MUAS 1522.702HarpSpring 2025 SPOT
MUAS 3522.703HarpSpring 2025 SPOT
MULB 1805.502OrchestraSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MULB 1806.510Wind SymphonySpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 1410.004Aural Skills IFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 1410.013Aural Skills IFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 1510.007Aural Skills IISpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 1510.009Aural Skills IISpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 1410.010Aural Skills IFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 1410.011Aural Skills IFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE