Faculty Profile

(Ginny) Kidwell

Title
Assistant Professor
Department
Management
College
College of Business

    

Education

PhD, University of Kentucky, 2013.
Major: Management
Degree Specialization: Organizational Behavior
Dissertation Title: The Heart of Social Networks: The Ripple Effect of Emotional Abilities in Relational Well-Being
MS, University of Kentucky, 2007.
Major: Economics
BS, Virginia-Tech, 2001.
Major: Finance

Current Scheduled Teaching*

MGMT 5120.001, Managing Organizational Design and Change, Summer 2020
MGMT 5120.026, Managing Organizational Design and Change, Summer 2020
MGMT 5140.001, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Summer 2020

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

MGMT 4980.001, Experimental Course, Spring 2020 Syllabus
MGMT 5140.001, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Spring 8W2 2020 Syllabus
MGMT 5140.026, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Spring 8W2 2020 Syllabus
MGMT 5140.801, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Spring 3W1 2020 Syllabus
MGMT 5140.001, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Fall 8W2 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5140.001, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Fall 8W1 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5140.026, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Fall 8W2 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5140.080, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Fall 8W1 2019 SPOT
MGMT 5140.080, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Fall 8W2 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5120.001, Managing Organizational Design and Change, Summer 5W2 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5120.080, Managing Organizational Design and Change, Summer 5W2 2019 SPOT
MGMT 6900.722, Special Problems, Summer 10W 2019
MGMT 5660.001, International Management, Spring 8W2 2019 SPOT
MGMT 5660.080, International Management, Spring 8W2 2019 SPOT
MGMT 5140.001, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Spring 8W1 2019 SPOT
MGMT 5140.080, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Spring 8W1 2019 SPOT
MGMT 5140.444, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Spring 3W1 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 6900.723, Special Problems, Spring 2019
MGMT 5660.001, International Management, Fall 8W2 2018 SPOT
MGMT 5660.080, International Management, Fall 8W2 2018 SPOT
MGMT 5140.001, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Fall 8W2 2018 SPOT
MGMT 5140.026, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Fall 8W2 2018 SPOT
MGMT 5140.080, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Fall 8W2 2018 SPOT
MGMT 6900.723, Special Problems, Fall 2018
MGMT 5660.001, International Management, Summer 5W1 2018 SPOT
MGMT 5660.080, International Management, Summer 5W1 2018 SPOT
MGMT 6900.722, Special Problems, Summer 10W 2018
MGMT 5660.001, International Management, Spring 8W2 2018 SPOT
MGMT 5660.026, International Management, Spring 8W2 2018 SPOT
MGMT 5660.080, International Management, Spring 8W2 2018 SPOT
MGMT 5660.086, International Management, Spring 8W2 2018 SPOT
MGMT 3720.006, Organizational Behavior, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5660.001, International Management, Fall 8W1 2017 SPOT
MGMT 5660.080, International Management, Fall 8W1 2017 SPOT
MGMT 5660.086, International Management, Fall 8W1 2017 SPOT
MGMT 5140.001, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Fall 8W2 2017 SPOT
MGMT 5140.080, Organizational Behavior and Analysis, Fall 8W2 2017 SPOT
MGMT 3720.003, Organizational Behavior, Summer 5W2 2017 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE