Skip to main content

William Chan

Title: Postdoctoral Research Associate

Department: Mathematics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, California Institute of Technology, 2017
    Major: Mathematics
    Dissertation: Aspects of Definability for Equivalency Relations

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MATH 3510.001Abstract Algebra ISpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 2730.003Multivariable CalculusFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 4500.001Introduction to TopologySpring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 5600.001Introduction to TopologySpring 2019 SPOT
MATH 5900.703Special ProblemsSpring 2019
MATH 6010.001Topics in Logic and FoundationsFall 2018 SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Trang, N., Jackson, S.C., Chan, W. (2023). More definable combinatorics around the first and second uncountable cardinal. Journal of Mathematical Logic. 23 (03) World Scientific.
  • Jackson, S.C., Chan, W. (2021). Definable Combinatorics at the First Uncountable Cardinal. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 374 (3) 2035-2056.
  • Trang, N., Jackson, S.C., Chan, W. (2021). The size of the class of countable sequences of ordinals. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. https://www.ams.org/journals/tran/0000-000-00/S0002-9947-2021-08573-6/
  • Jackson, S.C., Chan, W. (2021). The destruction of the Axiom of Determinacy by forcings on R when Theta is regular.. Israel Journal of Mathematics. 241 119-138.
  • Jackson, S.C., Chan, W. (2019). L(R) with Determinacy Satisfies the Suslin Hypothesis. Advances in Mathematics. 346 305-328. Elsevier.
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE