Skip to main content

Wendy L. Moore

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Mayborn School of Journalism

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MJ, University of North Texas, 2008
    Major: Journalism
  • BS, University of Texas at Tyler, 2001
    Major: Communication
  • AS, Panola College, 1999
    Major: Communication

Current Scheduled Teaching

JOUR 3260.401Web Design for JournalismFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ADVG 1100.201Applied Design for Advertising and Public RelationsSummer 5W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
JOUR 2250.001Media LiteracyFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
JOUR 5320.001New Technologies of Mass CommunicationFall 2023 SPOT
JOUR 3210.202Applied Design for Advertising and Public RelationsSummer 5W2 2023 Syllabus
JOUR 3210.201Applied Design for Advertising and Public RelationsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
JOUR 3210.201Applied Design for Advertising and Public RelationsFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
JOUR 3210.201Applied Design for Advertising and Public RelationsSummer 5W1 2020 Syllabus SPOT
JOUR 3210.203Applied Design for Advertising and Public RelationsSummer 5W2 2020 Syllabus SPOT
JOUR 3210.201Applied Design for Advertising and Public RelationsSpring 2020 Syllabus
JOUR 3210.802Applied Design for Advertising and Public RelationsFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE