Skip to main content

Whitney R. Johnson-Freeman

Title: Assistant Librarian

Department: Library - DL - Digital Curation Unit

College: University of North Texas

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MLS, University of North Texas, 2018
    Major: Digital Curation and Data Management
  • BA, University of North Texas, 2014
    Major: Radio/Television/Film

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Chapter

  • Johnson-Freeman, W.R., Scott, M. (2023). Engaging with the IR Remotely. Rethinking Institutional Repositories: Innovations in Management, Collections, and Inclusion. 45-58. Chicago, Illinois, Association of College and Research Libraries. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2234000/
  • Journal Article

  • Johnson-Freeman, W.R., Phillips, M.E., Phillips, K.K. (2021). Managing an institutional repository workflow with GitLab and a folder-based deposit system. Code4Lib Journal. (50) 9. Code4Lib. https://journal.code4lib.org/articles/15650

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Contract

  • Phillips, M.E. (Principal), Johnson-Freeman, W.R. (Co-Principal), "Chronicles of Oklahoma on the Gateway Project," sponsored by Oklahoma Historical Society, State, $35000 Funded. (2000).
  • Grant - Research

  • Roy, M.M. (Principal), Johnson-Freeman, W.R. (Supporting), "Evaluating Strategies to Promote Instructional Videos in an Academic Library: Enhancing Access, Awareness, and Engagement," sponsored by UNT Libraries, University of North Texas, $4800 Funded. (2023 - 2024).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE