Skip to main content

William Randall

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: ADA - Advanced Data Analytics

College: University of North Texas

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2022
    Major: Information Science
    Specialization: Data Science

Current Scheduled Teaching

ADTA 5340.400Discovery and Learning with Big DataSpring 8W1 2025
ADTA 5240.402Harvesting, Storing and Retrieving DataSpring 8W1 2025
ADTA 4340.400Methods for Discovery and Learning from DataSpring 8W1 2025
ADTA 5240.400Harvesting, Storing and Retrieving DataFall 8W1 2024 Syllabus
ADTA 4240.400Principles of Data Structures, Harvesting and WranglingFall 8W1 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ADTA 5240.403Harvesting, Storing and Retrieving DataSpring 8W1 2024 SPOT
IPAC 4340.700Methods for Discovery and Learning from DataSpring 8W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ADTA 5340.110Discovery and Learning with Big DataFall 8W2 2023 SPOT
ADTA 5240.101Harvesting, Storing and Retrieving DataFall 8W1 2023 SPOT
IPAC 4340.110Methods for Discovery and Learning from DataFall 8W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADTA 5340.112Discovery and Learning with Big DataSpring 8W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADTA 5240.103Harvesting, Storing and Retrieving DataSpring 8W1 2023 Syllabus SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Boakye, K., Prybutok, V.R., Randall, W., Ofori, K. (2023). Emotional connection and customer orientation as moderators in improving the customer satisfaction–behavioral intention link: A moderated moderation service model. Quality Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2023.2211285
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE