Faculty Profile

Xiaoqun Zhang

Xiaoqun Zhang

Title
Assistant Professor
Department
Media Arts
College
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

    

Education

PhD, Bowling Green State University, 2014.
Major: Media Studies
PhD, Tsinghua University, 2006.
Major: Public Policy
MS, Fudan University, 1997.
Major: Technology Management
BE, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1992.
Major: Dynamics Engineering

Current Scheduled Teaching*

MRTS 4670.100, Media Economics, Spring 2020
MRTS 5620.100, Media Economics, Spring 2020
MRTS 4430.100, Electronic Media Management, Fall 2019 Syllabus
MRTS 5660.001, Industry Studies Topics, Fall 2019
MRTS 5640.100, Media Management, Fall 2019
MRTS 4450.001, Topics in Industry Studies, Fall 2019 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

MRTS 4430.100, Electronic Media Management, Summer 5W1 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 5640.100, Media Management, Summer 5W1 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 4430.001, Electronic Media Management, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 4450.001, Topics in Industry Studies, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 4450.100, Topics in Industry Studies, Spring 3W1 2019 Syllabus
MRTS 4430.100, Electronic Media Management, Fall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 5640.100, Media Management, Fall 2018 SPOT
MRTS 4450.001, Topics in Industry Studies, Fall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 5660.100, Industry Studies Topics, Summer 5W2 2018 SPOT
MRTS 4450.100, Topics in Industry Studies, Summer 5W2 2018 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 4670.001, Media Economics, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 5660.001, Industry Studies Topics, Fall 2017 SPOT
MRTS 4450.001, Topics in Industry Studies, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 4450.002, Topics in Industry Studies, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 4670.001, Media Economics, Summer 5W2 2017 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 5660.002, Industry Studies Topics, Spring 2017 SPOT
MRTS 4670.001, Media Economics, Spring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 4450.002, Topics in Industry Studies, Spring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 5660.001, Industry Studies Topics, Fall 2016 SPOT
MRTS 5950.772, Master's Thesis, Fall 2016
MRTS 4670.001, Media Economics, Fall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
MRTS 5620.001, Media Economics, Fall 2016 SPOT
MRTS 4450.001, Topics in Industry Studies, Fall 2016 SPOT
RTVF 4670.001, Media Economics, Summer 5W1 2016 Syllabus SPOT
RTVF 5660.002, Industry Studies Topics, Spring 2016 SPOT
RTVF 4670.001, Media Economics, Spring 2016 Syllabus SPOT
RTVF 5620.001, Media Economics, Spring 2016 SPOT
RTVF 4450.002, Topics in Industry Studies, Spring 2016 SPOT
RTVF 5660.001, Industry Studies Topics, Fall 2015 SPOT
RTVF 4670.001, Media Economics, Fall 2015 Syllabus SPOT
RTVF 5620.001, Media Economics, Fall 2015 SPOT
RTVF 4450.001, Topics in Industry Studies, Fall 2015 Syllabus SPOT
RTVF 3996.001, Honors College Mentored Research Experience, Summer 5W1 2015
RTVF 5660.001, Industry Studies Topics, Summer 5W1 2015 SPOT
RTVF 4450.001, Topics in Industry Studies, Summer 5W1 2015 Syllabus SPOT
RTVF 4670.001, Media Economics, Spring 2015 Syllabus
RTVF 4450.003, Topics in Industry Studies, Spring 2015 Syllabus
RTVF 5660.002, Industry Studies Topics, Fall 2014
RTVF 4670.001, Media Economics, Fall 2014 Syllabus
RTVF 5620.001, Media Economics, Fall 2014
RTVF 4450.002, Topics in Industry Studies, Fall 2014 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE