Skip to main content

Yvonne D. Dooley

Title: Associate Librarian

Department: Library - PS - Library Research Support Services

College: University of North Texas

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MBA, University of North Texas,
    Major: Strategic Management
  • MS, University of North Texas, 2001
    Major: Library Science
  • BA, Texas Tech University, 1995
    Major: English

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Bibliographies & Guides

  • Dooley, Y. (2016). BRICS: Sources of Information. https://www.loc.gov/rr/business/brics/brics.html
  • Dooley, Y. (2016). Creative Ability in Business: A Guide to Selected Resources. http://www.loc.gov/rr/business/creativeability/creative_main.html

    • Blog Post

  • Dooley, Y. (2016). Featured Advertisement: Cracker Jack. Inside Adams. http://blogs.loc.gov/inside_adams/2016/11/featured-advertisement-cracker-jack/
  • Dooley, Y. (2016). John Horace McFarland: Unsung Hero of the National Park Service. Inside Adams. http://blogs.loc.gov/inside_adams/2016/08/john-horace-mcfarland-unsung-hero-of-the-national-park-service/
  • Yvonne, D. (2016). Money Matters: Harriet Tubman, the ‘Grand Watermelon’ Debate, and Redemption. Inside Adams. http://blogs.loc.gov/inside_adams/2016/06/money-matters-harriet-tubman-the-grand-watermelon-debate-and-redemption/
  • Yvonne, D. (2016). Commercialization of Valentine’s Day. Inside Adams. http://blogs.loc.gov/inside_adams/2016/02/commercialization-of-valentines-day/

    • Magazine/Trade Publication

  • Dooley, Y.D. (2020). Academic Librarians Creating Value through Commercialization Partnerships. Texas Library Journal. 96 (2.5) 97-99. Austin, Texas, Texas Library Association. https://issuu.com/txlibraryassociation/docs/tlj-specialedition-2020
  • Dooley, Y. (2016). America’s Public Libraries: Evolving and Thriving. Other. 5 (3) 15-18. http://www.loc.gov/lcm/pdf/LCM_2016_0506.pdf

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Service

  • Dooley, Y. (Principal), Jim, C. (Supporting), Monahan, J. (Supporting), Sittel, R. (Supporting), "Tackling the Digital Divide in Texas," sponsored by Dean's Innovation Grant / UNT Libraries, University of North Texas, $5000 Funded. (2021 - 2022).

    • Grant - Teaching

  • Manby, Y. (Principal), "Business Information Center Streaming Video Technology," sponsored by Friends of the SMU Libraries, Local, $1828 Funded. ( - 2003).
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE