Faculty Profile

Yvonne Dooley

Title
Associate Librarian
Department
Library - PS - Library Research Support Services
College
University of North Texas
Associate Librarian
Libraries
University of North Texas

    

    

      


                          

            
Curriculum Vitae

            

              Click Here to View Faculty CV
            

          

        
                          

            
Education

            



  

  


  
MBA, University of North Texas. 
Major: Strategic Management
MS, University of North Texas, 2001. 
Major: Library Science
BA, Texas Tech University, 1995. 
Major: English





          

        
                

          
Current Scheduled Teaching*


          
No current or future courses scheduled.


          
*
  Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of
  higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for
  undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
  

        

      

    

  


    

    

      


        


          


            
Previous Scheduled Teaching*


            
No previous courses available.

          


          
*
  Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of
  higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for
  undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
  

        

      

    

  

  
  	

	

	  

		

		   
Published Publications



  

  
Published Intellectual Contributions


  
Bibliographies & Guides
Blog Post
Dooley, Y.  (2016). Featured Advertisement: Cracker Jack. Inside Adams. http://blogs.loc.gov/inside_adams/2016/11/featured-advertisement-cracker-jack/
Dooley, Y.  (2016). John Horace McFarland: Unsung Hero of the National Park Service. Inside Adams. http://blogs.loc.gov/inside_adams/2016/08/john-horace-mcfarland-unsung-hero-of-the-national-park-service/
Yvonne, D.  (2016). Money Matters: Harriet Tubman, the ‘Grand Watermelon’ Debate, and Redemption. Inside Adams. http://blogs.loc.gov/inside_adams/2016/06/money-matters-harriet-tubman-the-grand-watermelon-debate-and-redemption/
Yvonne, D.  (2016). Commercialization of Valentine’s Day. Inside Adams. http://blogs.loc.gov/inside_adams/2016/02/commercialization-of-valentines-day/
Magazine/Trade Publication
Dooley, Y. D. (2020). Academic Librarians Creating Value through Commercialization Partnerships. Texas Library Journal. 96(2.5), 97-99.  Austin, Texas: Texas Library Association. https://issuu.com/txlibraryassociation/docs/tlj-specialedition-2020
Dooley, Y.  (2016). America’s Public Libraries: Evolving and Thriving. Other. 5(3), 15-18. http://www.loc.gov/lcm/pdf/LCM_2016_0506.pdf



	
		
		
	  

	

	

  
    
	

	

	  

		

		   
Awarded Grants



  
  
  	  
          
Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research  

 	 
	 	 
  
Grant - Service   
Dooley, Y. (Principal), Jim, C. (Supporting), Monahan, J. (Supporting), Sittel, R. (Supporting), "Tackling the Digital Divide in Texas," Sponsored by Dean's Innovation Grant / UNT Libraries, University of North Texas, $5000 Funded. (September 2021 – December 2022).
Grant - Teaching   
Manby, Y. (Principal), "Business Information Center Streaming Video Technology," Sponsored by Friends of the SMU Libraries, Local, $1828 Funded. (May 2003).



	
		
		
	  

	

	

	
	

  
  
  

  	

		

		,  
			
				

					
					Overall
Summative Rating		
					Challenge and
Engagement Index		
					Response Rate
					
				

			
			
				

					
					
out of 5		
					
out of 7		
					%
 of 
students responded		
					
					
				

			
		


		
    
			
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    
			This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
				
      
					
    • The course as a whole was
      • 
					
    • The course content was
      • 
					
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
      • 
					
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
      • 
				
    
			
    • 
			
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    
			This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
				
      
					
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
      • 
					
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
      • 
					
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
      • 
					
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
      • 
					
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
      • 
				
    
			
    • 
		

		CLOSE