Skip to main content

Yavuz Idug

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Supply Chain Management

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MBA, Naval Postgraduate School, 2011
    Major: Business Administration
    Dissertation: Defense Expenditures and Economic Growth Nexus: The Case of Turkey
  • BS, United States Military Academy, 2003
    Major: Political Science
    Specialization: International Politics - Leadership & Management Studies

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

LSCM 4560.007Business Transportation ManagementSummer 10W 2024 Syllabus SPOT
OPSM 3830.501Operations ManagementSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
OPSM 3830.502Operations ManagementFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
LSCM 4560.007Business Transportation ManagementSummer 10W 2023 Syllabus SPOT
LSCM 4560.501Business Transportation ManagementSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
LSCM 4560.501Business Transportation ManagementFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Chapter

  • Adana, S., Cevikparmak, S., Celik, H., Uvet, H., Idug, Y. (2022). Connecting decision-making to resilience: The importance of decentralization and Supply Chain Orientation in a post-COVID world. Supply Chain Resilience: Reconceptualizing Risk Management in a Post-Pandemic World.

    • Journal Article

  • Hong, S., Zhang, A., Caliskan, F., Idug, Y. (2025). Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance on Major Air Cargo Integrators’ Productivity. Other. Elsvier.
  • Caliskan, F., Idug, Y., Gligor, D., Hong, S. (2025). Blockchain Technology for Building Buyer-Supplier Trust and Transparency in Supply Chains: An Experimental Study on P2P Online Marketplace Vendors. Industrial Marketing Management. 124 239-254.
  • Hawkins, T.G., Finkenstadt, D., Porchia, J., Idug, Y. (2024). Oral Presentations – Exploring Fitness For Use and Associated Outcomes of a Forgotten Tool. Journal of Contract Management.
  • Idug, Y., Gligor, D.M., , J.P., Niranjan, S., Manuj, I., Nowicki, D.R. (2024). Exploring the impact of rider-driver ethnicity match/mismatch in ride-hailing. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management. 54 (3)
  • Hong, S., Farris, M.T., Pohlen, T.L., Idug, Y. (2023). Exploring the Impact of the Working Capital in the U.S. Aviation Industry for Profitability and Shareholder Value. Other. Elsevier.
  • Idug, Y., Niranjan, S., Manuj, I., Gligor, D.M., Ogden, J.A. (2023). Do ride-hailing drivers’ psychological behaviors influence operational performance?. International Journal Of Operations And Production Management.
  • Uvet, H. (2022). Decreasing e-waste through reliability enhancement encouraged by performance-based contracting. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.
  • Gligor, D.M., Stank, T.P., Gligor, N.M., Ogden, J.A., Nowicki, D.R., Farris, M.T., Idug, Y., Rana, R., Porchia, J., Patil, K.S. (2022). Examining the rigor of SCM research: the case of supply chain agility. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.
  • Uvet, H., Adana, S., Celik, H., Cevikparmak, S., Idug, Y. Quality investment as a catalyst for successful performance-based contracts: a relational view perspective. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing. (ahead-of-print) https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-02-2022-0076
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE