Skip to main content

Zohreh Farahmandpour

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Information Science

College: College of Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Analytics

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2025
    Major: Educational Leadership
    Dissertation: Transformational Leadership and the Correlates of Teacher Retention

Current Scheduled Teaching

INFO 4730.401Digital Curation and PreservationFall 2026 Syllabus
INFO 4730.402Digital Curation and PreservationFall 2026 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDLE 2010.001How Schools WorkSpring 8W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDLE 2010.002How Schools WorkSpring 8W2 2024 SPOT
EDLE 2010.002How Schools WorkFall 8W2 2023 SPOT
EDLE 2010.003How Schools WorkFall 8W1 2023 SPOT
EDLE 2010.006How Schools WorkSpring 8W1 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Farahmandpour, Z., Voelkel, R.H. (2025). Teacher Turnover Factors and School-Level Influences: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature. Education Sciences. 15 (2) 17.
  • Farahmandpour, Z., Voelkel, R.H. (2025). Unraveling the Causes of Teacher Turnover: A Meta-Analysis of Global Literature. Leadership and Policy in Schools. No. 18.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE