UNT | University of North Texas

Main menu

Cassie Thomas

Title
Adjunct Faculty
Department
Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology
College
College of Health and Public Service

Current Scheduled Teaching*

ASLP 6670.002, Medical Audiology, Spring 1 2019
ASLP 6730.004, Seminar in Audiology, Spring 1 2019
ASLP 6060.001, Clinical Audiology Advanced Practicum, Fall 1 2018
ASLP 6060.003, Clinical Audiology Advanced Practicum, Fall 1 2018
ASLP 6200.001, Neuroanatomy and Neurophysiology of the Auditory and Vestibular System, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

ASLP 4045.001, Basic Rehabilitative Audiology, Summer 5W2 2018 Syllabus SPOT
ASLP 6670.002, Medical Audiology, Spring 2018
ASLP 6200.001, Neuroanatomy and Neurophysiology of the Auditory and Vestibular System, Fall 2017
SPHS 3040.001, Introduction to Audiology, Spring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
SPHS 6200.001, Neuroanatomy and Neurophysiology of the Auditory and Vestibular System, Fall 2016
SPHS 6670.002, Medical Audiology, Spring 2014
SPHS 6060.004, Audiology Internship, Fall 2013
SPHS 6060.002, Audiology Internship, Spring 2013

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
1
Challenge and
Engagement Index
2
Response Rate
0
out of 5
0
out of 7
%
of
students responded
A Challenge and Engagement Index of "n/a" means
there were not enough student responses to calculate a score.
  • 1 Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • 2 Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE