Faculty Profile

Christy Crutsinger

Title
Vice Provost
Department
Merchandising and Digital Retailing
College
College of Merchandising, Hospitality and Tourism

    

Education

PhD, Texas Woman's University, Denton, TX, 1994.
Major: Merchandising, Minor: Business
Dissertation Title: Service Expectations of Female Fashion Consumers: A Comparison by Retail Store Format
MS, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, 1987.
Major: Human Resource Management, Minor: Education
BS, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, 1985.
Major: Secondary Education

Current Scheduled Teaching*

No current or future courses scheduled.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

CMHT 5700.001, Service Excellence, Spring 2020 Syllabus
MDSE 3370.001, Social Psychology of Dress and Appearance, Spring 2020 Syllabus
EDHE 6900.710, Special Problems, Spring 2014
SMHM 5920.009, Problem in Lieu of Thesis, Spring 2013
SMHM 5920.003, Problem in Lieu of Thesis, Fall 2011
SMHM 5910.002, Special Problems in Various Areas of Concentration, Fall 2011
SMHM 5920.005, Problem in Lieu of Thesis, Summer 10W 2011
SMHM 3370.001, Fashion Theory & Trend Analysis, Spring 2011 Syllabus
SMHM 5900.004, Special Problems in Various Areas of Concentration, Spring 2011
SMHM 4980.001, Experimental Course, Fall 2010 Syllabus
SMHM 5700.001, Service Excellence, Summer 5W1 2009
SMHM 5700.004, Service Excellence, Summer 5W1 2009
SMHM 5950.701, Master's Thesis, Summer 5W1 2008
SMHM 5900.703, Special Problems in Various Areas of Concentration, Summer 5W1 2008
SMHM 3370.001, Fashion Theory & Trend Analysis, Spring 2008
SMHM 5790.701, Field Experiences in Various Areas of Concentration, Spring 2008
SMHM 5950.703, Master's Thesis, Spring 2008
SMHM 5950.701, Master's Thesis, Fall 2007
SMHM 5500.002, Merchandising Strategies, Fall 2007
SMHM 5500.004, Merchandising Strategies, Fall 2007
SMHM 3370.001, Fashion Theory & Trend Analysis, Spring 2007
SMHM 4500.002, Internship in Merchandising and Hospitality Management, Fall 2006
SMHM 5950.701, Master's Thesis, Fall 2006
SMHM 3350.001, Survey of Historic and Contemporary Styles, Fall 2006
SMHM 5900.701, Special Problems in Various Areas of Concentration, Summer 5W2 2006
SMHM 3370.001, Fashion Theory & Trend Analysis, Spring 2006
SMHM 5790.702, Field Experiences in Various Areas of Concentration, Spring 2006
SMHM 4500.002, Internship in Merchandising and Hospitality Management, Spring 2006
SMHM 5950.701, Master's Thesis, Spring 2006
SMHM 5950.701, Master's Thesis, Fall 2005
SMHM 5500.002, Merchandising Strategies, Fall 2005
SMHM 3350.001, Survey of Historic and Contemporary Styles, Fall 2005
SMHM 5700.002, Service Excellence, Summer 3W1 2005
SMHM 3370.001, Fashion Theory & Trend Analysis, Spring 2005
SMHM 4500.002, Internship in Merchandising and Hospitality Management, Spring 2005
SMHM 5900.704, Special Problems in Various Areas of Concentration, Spring 2005
SMHM 5910.004, Special Problems in Various Areas of Concentration, Spring 2005
SMHM 2360.001, Aesthetics and Environment, Fall 2004
SMHM 5790.704, Field Experiences in Various Areas of Concentration, Fall 2004
SMHM 4500.002, Internship in Merchandising and Hospitality Management, Fall 2004
SMHM 5950.704, Master's Thesis, Fall 2004
SMHM 3350.001, Survey of Historic and Contemporary Styles, Fall 2004

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE