UNT | University of North Texas

Main menu

Elias Mpofu

Title
Professor
Department
Rehabilitation and Health Services
College
College of Health and Public Service

Education

EdD, University of Pretoria, 2010.
Major: Educational Psychology
MSc, University of Zimbabwe, 1999.
Major: Educational Psychology
Dissertation Title: Socio-cultural effects on children's performance on class inclusion tasks
PhD, Univ Of Wisconsin - Madison, 1999.
Major: Rehabilitation Psychology
Dissertation Title: Social acceptance of early adolescents with physical disabilities

Current Scheduled Teaching*

RHAB 5741.810, Employment and Career Development, Spring 1 2019
RHAB 5741.820, Employment and Career Development, Spring 1 2019
RHAB 6710.001, Health Disparities and Social Justice, Spring 1 2019
RHAB 6730.001, Disability, Health, and Functioning, Fall 1 2018
AGER 6950.702, Doctoral Dissertation, Fall 1 2018
HLSR 6200.001, Research Methods and Design, Fall 1 2018

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

RHAB 6710.001, Health Disparities and Social Justice, Spring 2018

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
1
Challenge and
Engagement Index
2
Response Rate
0
out of 5
0
out of 7
%
of
students responded
A Challenge and Engagement Index of "n/a" means
there were not enough student responses to calculate a score.
  • 1 Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • 2 Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE