Faculty Profile

Hepi Wachter

Hepi Wachter

Title
Chair
Department
Design
College
College of Visual Arts and Design

    

Education

PhD, University of Oklahoma, 2018.
Major: Environmental Design Interdisciplinary Studies
Degree Specialization: Environmental Gerontology
Dissertation Title: Exploring Educational Interests and Preferences of Older Adults
MFA, Kunstakademie Düsseldorf (Germany), 1990.
Major: Sculptor
MArch, Kunstakademie Düsseldorf (Germany), 1989.
Major: Architecture
Degree Specialization: Art and Philosophy
Dissertation Title: Movement and Speed Persecption in Architectural Design
Diplom Ingeneur, University of Applied Sience, 1984.
Major: Interior Architecture
Dissertation Title: Klepperstrasse Rosenheim

Current Scheduled Teaching*

ADES 4615.900, Topics in Interior Design, Spring 2021
ADES 4700.722, Professional Internship, Fall 2020 Syllabus
ADES 4615.900, Topics in Interior Design, Fall 2020 Syllabus
ADES 4615.950, Topics in Interior Design, Fall 2020 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

ADES 4615.001, Topics in Interior Design, Summer 5W2 2020 Syllabus
ART 4120.888, Art on Location, Spring 3W1 2020 Syllabus
ADES 4700.722, Professional Internship, Spring 2020 Syllabus
ADES 4700.739, Professional Internship, Fall 2019 Syllabus
ADES 4700.722, Professional Internship, Summer 5W2 2019 Syllabus
ART 4120.601, Art on Location, Spring 3W1 2019 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 4900.739, Special Problems, Spring 2019
ADES 4700.739, Professional Internship, Fall 2018 Syllabus
ADES 4700.739, Professional Internship, Spring 2018 Syllabus
ADES 4900.001, Special Problems, Spring 2018
ADES 4615.002, Topics in Interior Design, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE