Faculty Profile

Joshua Habermann

Title
Adjunct Faculty
Department
Conducting and Ensembles
College
College of Music

    

Education

DMA, University of Texas, 1997.
Major: Music
MMus, University of Texas, 1995.
Major: Music

Current Scheduled Teaching*

MUAG 5812.001, Choral Literature III, Spring 2024

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

MUAG 5810.001, Choral Literature I, Spring 2023 SPOT
MUAG 5811.002, Choral Literature II, Fall 2022 SPOT
MUAG 5812.001, Choral Literature III, Fall 2021 SPOT
MUGC 5900.701, Special Problems, Summer 10W 2021
MUAG 5810.001, Choral Literature I, Spring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 5811.001, Choral Literature II, Fall 2020 SPOT
MUAG 5812.001, Choral Literature III, Fall 2019
MUAG 4910.703, Special Problems, Fall 2019
MUAG 5810.001, Choral Literature I, Spring 2019 SPOT
MUAG 5811.001, Choral Literature II, Fall 2018 SPOT
MUAG 5812.001, Choral Literature III, Spring 2018 SPOT
MUAG 5810.001, Choral Literature I, Spring 2017 SPOT
MUAG 5811.001, Choral Literature II, Fall 2016 SPOT
MUAG 5812.001, Choral Literature III, Spring 2016 SPOT
MUAG 5810.001, Choral Literature I, Spring 2015
MUAG 5811.001, Choral Literature II, Fall 2014
MUAG 5812.001, Choral Literature III, Spring 2014
MUAG 5800.001, Advanced Choral Conducting, Fall 2013
MUAG 5810.001, Choral Literature, Spring 2013
MUAG 5811.001, Choral Literature II, Fall 2012
MUAG 5810.001, Choral Literature, Spring 2012
MUAG 5800.001, Advanced Choral Conducting, Fall 2011

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE