Faculty Profile

Kevin Siefert

Title
Teaching Fellow
Department
Philosophy and Religion
College
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

    

Current Scheduled Teaching*

No current or future courses scheduled.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

PHIL 2500.003, Environment and Society, Spring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 2500.004, Environment and Society, Spring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 2600.001, Ethics in Science, Fall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 2600.002, Ethics in Science, Fall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.001, Introduction to Philosophy, Summer 5W1 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 2600.001, Ethics in Science, Spring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 2600.002, Ethics in Science, Spring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.007, Introduction to Philosophy, Fall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.008, Introduction to Philosophy, Fall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.001, Introduction to Philosophy, Summer 5W1 2021 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.003, Introduction to Philosophy, Spring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.004, Introduction to Philosophy, Spring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 2050.201, Introduction to Logic, Fall 2019
PHIL 2050.205, Introduction to Logic, Fall 2019

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE