Faculty Profile

Kimberly Moore

Title
Adjunct Faculty
Department
Information Science
College
College of Information

    

Education

MS, University of North Texas, 2006.
Major: Library Science
Degree Specialization: Information Science
BS, University of North Texas, 2004.
Major: Information Science
Degree Specialization: Library Science

Current Scheduled Teaching*

No current or future courses scheduled.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

INFO 4430.001, Information Resources for Young Adults, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4430.001, Information Resources for Young Adults, Fall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4430.001, Information Resources for Young Adults, Fall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5845.001, Creating Online Content for Youth Services, Summer 5W2 2021 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5845.005, Creating Online Content for Youth Services, Summer 5W2 2021 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4430.001, Information Resources for Young Adults, Fall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5845.001, Creating Online Content for Youth Services, Summer 5W2 2020 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5845.005, Creating Online Content for Youth Services, Summer 5W2 2020 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4430.001, Information Resources for Young Adults, Fall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5845.001, Creating Online Content for Youth Services, Summer 5W2 2019 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5845.005, Creating Online Content for Youth Services, Summer 5W2 2019 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4430.001, Information Resources for Young Adults, Fall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4430.005, Information Resources for Young Adults, Fall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5845.001, Creating Online Content for Youth Services, Summer 5W2 2018 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5845.005, Creating Online Content for Youth Services, Summer 5W2 2018 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4430.001, Information Resources for Young Adults, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5845.001, Creating Online Content for Youth Services, Summer 5W2 2017 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5845.005, Creating Online Content for Youth Services, Summer 5W2 2017 SPOT
INFO 5960.002, Library and Information Sciences Institute or Seminar, Spring 2017 SPOT
INFO 5960.005, Library and Information Sciences Institute or Seminar, Spring 2017 SPOT
INFO 5960.012, Library and Information Sciences Institute or Seminar, Spring 2017 SPOT
INFO 5960.016, Library and Information Sciences Institute or Seminar, Spring 2017
INFO 5845.001, Creating Online Content for Youth Services, Summer 5W2 2016 SPOT
INFO 5845.005, Creating Online Content for Youth Services, Summer 5W2 2016 SPOT
INFO 5960.012, Library and Information Sciences Institute or Seminar, Spring 2016 SPOT
INFO 5960.016, Library and Information Sciences Institute or Seminar, Spring 2016 SPOT
SLIS 5960.012, Library and Information Sciences Institute or Seminar, Spring 2015

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Publications

Published Intellectual Contributions

Journal Article
Moore, K. R. (2020). Teaching Students 3D Design. Computers in Libraries. 40(2), 32-37. Medford, New Jersey: Information Today, Inc.. http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/default.shtml
Moore, K. R. (2019). Tools and Tips for Helping Students Create ePortfolios. Computers in Libraries. 39(8), 32-37. Medford, N.J.: Information Today, Inc.. http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE