Faculty Profile

Layla Seale

Title
Visiting Assistant Professor
Department
Art History
College
College of Visual Arts and Design

    

Education

PhD, Rice University, 2020.
Major: Medieval/Early Modern Art History

Current Scheduled Teaching*

ART 2350.001, Art History Survey I, Spring 2024 Syllabus
ARTH 5805.001, Seminar in Medieval Art, Spring 2024 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

ART 2350.001, Art History Survey I, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ARTH 4805.001, Topics in Medieval Art, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2350.001, Art History Survey I, Spring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ARTH 5805.001, Seminar in Medieval Art, Spring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ARTH 4805.001, Topics in Medieval Art, Spring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2350.001, Art History Survey I, Fall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ARTH 4801.001, Topics in Art History, Fall 2022 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Publications

Published Intellectual Contributions

Journal Article
Seale, L. (2023). Work is Hell: Demon Laborers in Late Medieval Art. (10), .
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE